Deepti Sharma Mankad is the most recent talk all over. Is Deepti Sharma Mankad a legal runout? Read this article to know what exactly happened in the incident.

Mankading is commonly known that it comes from India’s Vinoo Mankad, who famously ran out Australian player Bill Brown in the same manner in the 1947 Sydney test. It is a legal and provision act according to the sportsmanship and spirit of the game side.

Law 41.16 says that the non-striker is out of their ground from the moment the ball dismisses until the instant when the bowler would normally have been expected to release the ball; the non-striker is possible to be Run out.

Deepti Sharma Mankad – Is Legal Or Backstabbing?

The Indian women’s team defeated England at Lord’s on Saturday to end the three-match series and give a farewell to the legendary Jhulan Goswami. But the entire match revolved around India spinner Deepti Sharma Mankad runout of Charlie Dean at the non-striker’s end.

In England’s innings 44th over, Deepti Sharma came up to dismiss the ball to no.7 Freya Davies and Charlie Dean at the non-striker’s end when the non-striker attempted to leave the crease early and steal a few yards by wandering out of her end.

Deepti turned around to run her out in her dismissal stride, which meant a 16-run for India and a 3-0 series end. The immediate run out of Charlie Dean attracted boos from the Lord’s cricket ground crowd.

D Sharma Mankad

D Sharma Mankad incident divides the cricketing world again on the runout from the non-striker’s end rule, which is entirely the game’s law. But this incident didn’t sit comfortably with England fans and pundits, while Indian fans had a field day on Twitter.

The incident has become controversial, with England’s cricketing fraternity accusing India of disregarding the game of spirit even though it is an entirely legal action according to the law of MCC.

Deepti Sharma Mankad Video

Deepti Sharma Mankad has broken the cricket world into two halves. Even the cricketing legends are against each other when it comes to Mankad. Few support Mankad as it comes under the cricket law, but few oppose it because it’s against the sportsmanship of the cricket game. Let’s look at the Mankad Deepti Sharma video to say our view on that.

Deepti Sharma Mankad Twitter

Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) tweeted the statement that the rules favor Deepti Sharma Mankad runout incident against England.

MCC announced this year that the amendments to the cricket law states run out from the non-striker’s end are legal. It is now under Law 38 run out. Earlier it was from Law 41 unfair play. The change will come into effect on 1 October 2022.

Also, the MCC tweets state that the law is clear and that all umpires must be easily interpreted throughout all levels and moments of the game. Cricket is a broad and spirited game by which it is played in no different way. As custodians of the spirit of cricket, the MCC appreciates its application as interpreted across the globe.

It says that the respectful debate is healthy and should continue, where one sees the bowler as breaching the spirit in such examples. Another will point at the non-striker gaining an unfair advantage by moving their ground early.

So MCC advises the non-striker’s continue to remain on their ground until they have seen the ball leave the bowler’s hand. Follow this to avoid such incidents not happening. While it was not a regular end to an exciting match, it was officiated correctly and should not be considered anything more, “MCC tweeted. Let’s look about the comments that cricketing legends say about Deepti Sharma Mankad in Twitter.

Deepti Sharma Mankad FAQ

Conclusion – Mankad Deepti Sharma

Deepti Sharma Mankad run out was a legal action. The provision to run the non-striker out is clearly against cricket law. Even Don Bradman insisted on mankading back then. He was the captain of that Australian team in 1947. Some cricketers still argue that mankading is against the spirit of the game, but it is legal as per the law of cricket.